Online Tools Optimise Solid-State Lighting Performance
Osama Mannan, Technical Marketing Engineer, Future Lighting Solutions (a division of Future Electronics)
 |
READ THIS TO FIND OUT ABOUT:
 |
- Obtaining real-world analysis of an LED-lighting system and determining the effect of design tradeoffs prior to building.
- Refining design parameters and achieving improved performance with tools such as the usable light tool, the LED-reliability tool and QLED.
|
 |
|
|
Every engineer designing an LED luminaire will have a target for
lumen output, longevity and efficiency. But as Figure 1 shows, the
interactions of the key variables in solid-state lighting – heat and
current – are complex. Osama Mannan, Technical Marketing
Engineer, Future Lighting Solutions (a division of Future
Electronics) shows how they also change between parts from
different manufacturers.
Unfortunately, LED manufacturers’ datasheets do not necessarily make it easy
for engineers to take these, and other performance variables, into account
when making system design decisions. For instance, one factor which defines
LED-system performance is the reliability of the LEDs. Unlike traditional
incandescent light sources, which normally fail completely, LEDs show a
decline in lumen output from a peak when the LED is new. So reliability in
LEDs is expressed in terms of lumen maintenance, which is the rate of decline
of lumen output against hours of use.
Generally, reliability data from LED manufacturers provides an average or
typical representation of the lumen maintenance at a specific current and
junction temperature. In reality, however, LEDs degrade differently over time,
even with LEDs from the same reel, producing a distribution in both lumen
depreciation and time across a complete population of LEDs. As a result, it is
critical to include a probability factor when discussing lifetime and lumen
maintenance.

Fig. 1: Relationship between variables affecting LED operation.
For lighting designers to make informed design decisions, they will
need access to such distribution information. LED manufacturer, Philips
Lumileds, has addressed this requirement by expressing LED-lifetime data
in terms of (Bxx, Lyy). For instance, (B10, L70) would mean that 10% of the
LED population will fail to maintain 70% lumen maintenance at a specific
current, junction temperature, and elapsed operating time. This lifetime
data is presented graphically with reference to drive current and junction
temperature (see Figure 2).
To incorporate all the above concepts, and to manipulate the
design variables in order to achieve the best performance, the LED
Reliability Tool (LRT) and the Usable Light Tool (ULT), available free at
www.FutureLightingSolutions.com, can be used to make design trade-off
decisions and to provide designers with a true real-world analysis of high-power
LEDs.

Fig. 2: (Bxx,Lyy) Lifetime curves for LUXEON Rebel LEDs.
The application of these tools is best illustrated through an example.
Many lighting-equipment manufacturers now face the requirement to
meet government-mandated performance specifications, such as the US
government’s Energy Star Programme for solid-state lighting.
The Energy Star standard for a commercial recessed downlight, for
example, requires the luminaire to have a minimum light output of 575lm,
minimum efficacy of 35lm/W, and 70% lumen maintenance at a minimum
of 35,000 hours. The ULT can be used to calculate light output, junction
temperature and efficacy for systems using LUXEON® LEDs from Philips
Lumileds.
For instance, running the ULT using seven, 80-lumen LUXEON® Rebel
LEDs, at 800mA current, with an ambient temperature of 30°C, using a
heat-sink with thermal resistance of 5°C/W, will generate 810 lumens of
usable light, a junction temperature of 127°C, and efficacy of 46.31lm/W,
as shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 3: ULT calculations for recessed downlight example.
The light output results in the ULT are adjusted for heat but not for optical
losses due to secondary optics. Therefore, to account for these optical losses,
an optical efficiency of 80% will be assumed for the secondary optics.
Incorporating the optical losses will decrease the ULT results to 37lm/W
efficacy and 648 lumen output, which still meet the Energy Star requirements.
Since the optical performance specification has been met, the LED
Reliability Tool can now be used to determine whether the design will meet
the lifetime requirement of 35,000 hours. Figure 4 illustrates an LRT lifetime
output screenshot for a LUXEON Rebel LED with a probability distribution
of (B10, L70), drive current of 800mA and junction temperature of 127°C.
This scenario, where the data originates from the ULT output,
generates an expected lifetime of 40,000 hours, thus surpassing the
Energy Star lifetime target, as well as in addition to the lumen output
and efficacy specifications for recessed downlight applications.

Fig. 4: LRT lifetime calculations and curve.
It is worth noting that all LRT results have a confidence interval of 90%.
The above design can be further refined by adjusting the thermal
management solution. The designer may wish to modify the LED drive current,
heat sink, the luminaire fixture and the ambient conditions, in order to instantly
verify the effects of these adjustments on the overall system. In order to
accomplish this task, QLED thermal design and simulation software, available
at www.FutureLightingSolutions.com, can be used. QLED guides users
through step-by-step design wizards to select, place and simulate power LEDs
mounted on FR-4 boards or Metal-Core Printed Circuit Boards (MCPCBs).
Additionally, users can seamlessly integrate thermal vias, heat sinks, fans and
fixtures to generate the most accurate transient or steady-state thermal
simulations. Figure 5 demonstrates a QLED project before and after the
thermal simulation for a 7-LED recessed downlight application using seven
LUXEON Rebel LEDs.

Fig. 5: QLED thermal simulation example.
It is evident that obtaining a real-world analysis of an LED-lighting system
and determining the effects of design trade-offs prior to building it can
significantly save time, cost, and effort in the prototyping cycle. Likewise, using
tools that perform calculations and help to instantly verify the effects of
adjustments on the overall system will provide a more comprehensive end
result.
Tools such as the Usable Light Tool, the LED-Reliability Tool, and QLED are all
available at www.FutureLightingSolutions.com and can be used to
ease the design and prototyping stage, and showcase immediate results.
These results enable designers to further refine
design parameters and achieve improved performance for their
design in order to develop efficient systems, both optically and
thermally, to meet the specifications of emerging standards.
©Copyright 2008 Future Electronics Ltd. All trademarks contained herein are the property of
their respective owners. All applications for samples, badge boards, demo kits and other
advertised materials from Future Electronics are subject to qualification.